linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event scmi_xfer_response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210825175233.GH13160@e120937-lin>
Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:52:33 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event
 scmi_xfer_response_wait

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:31:13PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/24/2021 3:59 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Use new trace event to mark start of waiting for response section.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> 
Hi Florian,

Thanks for the review and the feedback across this series.

> Might be worth squashing into patch 4?
> 

Yes indeed I never know for sure when to squash when stuff crosses
subsystems/maintaners boundaries.

Thanks,
Cristian