linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: Remove unnecessary condition checking from ntfs_file_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:31:00 +0300
From:   Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: Remove unnecessary condition checking from
 ntfs_file_read_iter

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:17:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:25:22PM +0300, Kari Argillander wrote:
> > This check will be also performed in generic_file_read_iter() so we do
> > not want to check this two times in a row.
> > 
> > This was founded with Smatch
> > 	fs/ntfs3/file.c:803 ntfs_file_read_iter()
> > 	warn: unused return: count = iov_iter_count()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
> > ---
> > I cc Dan also because I am happy that I finally managed to install
> > Smack and straight away I found something with it. Thank you for
> > this great tool.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> You got a bit lucky, because you're using the --two-passes and the truth
> is I haven't looked at that in years so I'm worried it's probably not
> great.  You probably be better off not using the --two-passes option.  :/
> I should remove it.

Haha no I need it :D I was just testing what this tool can do. I also
notice that --two-passes seems quite bad to read. But hey I found
something! :D Good to know that you are not using it. I will not use it
then. Thanks.

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
>