[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210826102337.GA7362@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:23:37 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org
Subject: CVE-2021-3600 aka bpf: Fix 32 bit src register truncation on div/mod
Hi!
As far as I can tell, CVE-2021-3600 is still a problem for 4.14 and
4.19.
Unfortunately, those kernels lack BPF_JMP32 support, and that support
is too big and intrusive to backport.
So I tried to come up with solution without JMP32 support... only to
end up with not seeing the bug in the affected code.
Changelog says:
bpf: Fix 32 bit src register truncation on div/mod
While reviewing a different fix, John and I noticed an oddity in one of the
BPF program dumps that stood out, for example:
# bpftool p d x i 13
0: (b7) r0 = 808464450
1: (b4) w4 = 808464432
2: (bc) w0 = w0
3: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
4: (9c) w4 %= w0
[...]
In line 2 we noticed that the mov32 would 32 bit truncate the original src
register for the div/mod operation. While for the two operations the dst
register is typically marked unknown e.g. from adjust_scalar_min_max_vals()
the src register is not, and thus verifier keeps tracking original bounds,
simplified:
So this explains "mov32 w0, w0" is problematic, and fixes the bug by
replacing it with jmp32. Unfortunately, I can't do that in 4.19; plus
I don't really see how the bug is solved -- we avoided adding mov32
sequence that triggers the problem, but the problematic sequence could
still be produced by the userspace, no?
Does adjust_scalar_min_max_vals still need fixing?
Do you have any hints how to solve this in 4.19?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists