[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e864f9d133d4db3923190f5acacc32a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:59:14 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Pavel Skripkin' <paskripkin@...il.com>
CC: "Larry.Finger@...inger.net" <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"phil@...lpotter.co.uk" <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"straube.linux@...il.com" <straube.linux@...il.com>,
"fmdefrancesco@...il.com" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
"linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/6] staging: r8188eu: add error handling of rtw_read32
From: Pavel Skripkin
> Sent: 26 August 2021 11:55
>
> On 8/26/21 1:22 PM, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Pavel Skripkin
> >> Sent: 26 August 2021 10:28
> >>
> >> On 8/26/21 12:22 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:51:23 +0000
> >> > David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
> > ...
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > -static u32 usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr)
> >> >> > +static int usb_read32(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u32 addr, u32
> >> >> > *data) {
> >> >> > u8 requesttype;
> >> >> > u16 wvalue;
> >> >> > u16 len;
> >> >> > - __le32 data;
> >> >> > + int res;
> >> >> > + __le32 tmp;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!data)))
> >> >> > + return -EINVAL;
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Kill the NULL check - it is a silly coding error.
> >> >> An OOPS is just as easy to debug.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I don't think that one single driver should kill the whole system. It's
> >> > 100% an error, but kernel can recover from it (for example disconnect
> >> > the driver, since it's broken).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > AFIAK, Greg and Linus do not like BUG_ONs in recoverable state...
> >> > Correct me, if I am wrong
> >> >
> >> Oops, I thought about BUG_ON() instead of WARN_ON(), sorry for
> >> confusion. My point is "we should not let the box boom".
> >
> >
> > There is no point checking for NULL that just can't happen.
> > In this case all the callers will pass the address of a local.
> > There really is no point checking.
> >
>
> We not always read in local variable, there are few places, where we
> read into passed buffer.
It is still a very local coding bug.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists