lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:29:54 +0200
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
        hannes@...xchg.org, vipinsh@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] misc_cgroup: use a counter to count the number of
 failures

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 09:34:45AM +0800, brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com> wrote:
> The core logic of pids cgroup and misc cgroup is similar.

Yes, the latter is conceptually a generalization of the former and it can
be tempting to use the general form. Beware that pids controller would
need to retain its existing API (and the behavior of being an
independent controller) and that would be IMO exceptions
counterweighting the generalization.

> Is it possible for us to merge pids cgroup into misc cgroup?

Technically it might be possible but I can't see the benefit (but maybe
you envisioned something else where my reasoning won't apply).

Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ