linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/98] 5.10.61-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YSeO3bNOstcpo9P0@sashalap>
Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:53:49 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/98] 5.10.61-rc1 review

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>Hi Sasha,
>
>On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:57:30PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.61 release.
>> There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu 26 Aug 2021 04:58:25 PM UTC.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
>Build test:
>mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 63 configs -> no new failure
>arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 105 configs -> no new failure
>arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210816): 3 configs -> no failure
>x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure
>
>Boot test:
>x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
>x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
>arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
>
>[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/56
>[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/57
>
>
>Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

Thanks for testing, Sudip!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha