linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: imx6ul: Move csi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:20:48 +0200
From:   Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: imx6ul: Move csi_sel mux to correct base register

The csi_sel mux register is located in the CCM register base and not the
CCM_ANALOG register base. So move it to the correct position in code.

Otherwise changing the parent of the csi clock can lead to a complete
system failure due to the CCM_ANALOG_PLL_SYS_TOG register being falsely
modified.

Also remove the SET_RATE_PARENT flag since one possible supply for the
csi_sel mux is the system PLL which we don't want to modify.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>
---
 drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
index 5dbb6a937732..206e4c43f68f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx6ul.c
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
 	hws[IMX6UL_PLL5_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll5_bypass", base + 0xa0, 16, 1, pll5_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll5_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
 	hws[IMX6UL_PLL6_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll6_bypass", base + 0xe0, 16, 1, pll6_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll6_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
 	hws[IMX6UL_PLL7_BYPASS] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("pll7_bypass", base + 0x20, 16, 1, pll7_bypass_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll7_bypass_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
-	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL] = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
 
 	/* Do not bypass PLLs initially */
 	clk_set_parent(hws[IMX6UL_PLL1_BYPASS]->clk, hws[IMX6UL_CLK_PLL1]->clk);
@@ -270,6 +269,7 @@ static void __init imx6ul_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
 	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_ECSPI_SEL]	  = imx_clk_hw_mux("ecspi_sel",	base + 0x38, 18, 1, ecspi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ecspi_sels));
 	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_PRE_SEL]	  = imx_clk_hw_mux_flags("lcdif_pre_sel", base + 0x38, 15, 3, lcdif_pre_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_pre_sels), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
 	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LCDIF_SEL]	  = imx_clk_hw_mux("lcdif_sel",	base + 0x38, 9, 3, lcdif_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(lcdif_sels));
+	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_CSI_SEL]		  = imx_clk_hw_mux("csi_sel", base + 0x3c, 9, 2, csi_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(csi_sels));
 
 	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI0_DIV_SEL]  = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di0", base + 0x20, 10, 1, ldb_di0_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di0_div_sels));
 	hws[IMX6UL_CLK_LDB_DI1_DIV_SEL]  = imx_clk_hw_mux("ldb_di1", base + 0x20, 11, 1, ldb_di1_div_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(ldb_di1_div_sels));
-- 
2.25.1