linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/sgx: Add the missing ifdef for sgx_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YSfC2vhMxaUY2j/H@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:35:38 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/sgx: Add the missing ifdef for
 sgx_set_attribute()

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 07:08:07PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> I made this change because I'm including the header to set_memory.c, and

This is something you're doing locally, I presume. If so, you can keep
this patch local too.

> It's also incoherent that KVM specific functions are compilation flagged

They don't really have to be - they're just declarations.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette