[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSfNATLcGI4haI89@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:18:57 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Memory folios for v5.15
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:48:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:38 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > "pageset" is such a great name that we already use it, so I guess that
> > doesn't work.
>
> Actually, maybe I can backtrack on that a bit.
>
> Maybe 'pageset' would work as a name. It's not used as a type right
> now, but the usage where we do have those comments around 'struct
> per_cpu_pages' are actually not that different from the folio kind of
> thing. It has a list of "pages" that have a fixed order.
>
> So that existing 'pageset' user might actually fit in conceptually.
> The 'pageset' is only really used in comments and as part of a field
> name, and the use does seem to be kind of consistent with the Willy's
> use of a "aligned allocation-group of pages".
The 'pageset' in use in mm/page_alloc.c really seems to be more of a
pagelist than a pageset. The one concern I have about renaming it is
that we actually print the word 'pagesets' in /proc/zoneinfo.
There's also some infiniband driver that uses the word "pageset"
which really seems to mean "DMA range".
So if I rename the existing mm pageset to pagelist, and then modify all
these patches to call a folio a pageset, you'd take this patchset?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists