[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163000270629.1317818.2836576068466077505@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 11:31:46 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] clk: qcom: use power-domain for sm8250's clock controllers
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-07-27 13:19:56)
> On SM8250 both the display and video clock controllers are powered up by
> the MMCX power domain. Handle this by linking clock controllers to the
> proper power domain, and using runtime power management to enable and
> disable the MMCX power domain.
>
> Dependencies:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210703005416.2668319-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
> (pending)
Does this patch series need to go through the qcom tree? Presumably the
dependency is going through qcom -> arm-soc
>
> Changes since v5:
> - Dropped devm_pm_runtime_enable callback to remove extra dependency
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Dropped pm_runtime handling from drivers/clk/qcom/common.c Moved the
> code into dispcc-sm8250.c and videocc-sm8250.c
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Wrap gdsc_enable/gdsc_disable into pm_runtime_get/put calls rather
> than calling pm_runtime_get in gdsc_enabled and _put in gdsc_disable
> - Squash gdsc patches together to remove possible dependencies between
> two patches.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists