linux-kernel - Re: [v2 0/2] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Support enabling a 3.3V rail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:48:33 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:     yangcong <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 0/2] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Support enabling a 3.3V rail

Sam / Thierry,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:01 AM yangcong
<yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> Compared to v1, "pp3300-supply" is removed in the required list:
> dt-bindings: drm/panel:
>    - reg
>    - enable-gpios
>    - pp1800-supply
> -  - pp3300-supply
>    - avdd-supply
>    - avee-supply
>
> yangcong (2):
>   drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Support enabling a 3.3V rail
>   dt-bindings: drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Support enabling a 3.3V rail
>
>  .../bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml      |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c        | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

I've been keeping track of this series since this panel is supposed to
be used on a future Chrome OS project. It's quite simple and the
bindings now have Rob's Review. I'm happy to take care of landing them
in drm-misc-next if that's OK with you two (since you're listed as
maintainers in the bindings).

-Doug