linux-kernel - [PATCH next v2 1/6] Revert "usb: xhci-mtk: relax TT periodic bandwidth allocation"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:51:39 +0800
From:   Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>,
        Eddie Hung <eddie.hung@...iatek.com>,
        Yaqii wu <yaqii.wu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH next v2 1/6] Revert "usb: xhci-mtk: relax TT periodic bandwidth allocation"

As discussed in following patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12420339

No need calculate number of uframes again, but should use value
form check_sch_tt(), if we plan to remove extra CS, also can do
it in check_sch_tt(). So revert this patch, and prepare to send
new patch for it.

This reverts commit 548011957d1d72e0b662300c8b32b81d593b796e.

Cc: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
---
v2: no changes
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 20 +++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
index 46cbf5d54f4f..f9b4d27ce449 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c
@@ -459,17 +459,16 @@ static int check_fs_bus_bw(struct mu3h_sch_ep_info *sch_ep, int offset)
 	u32 num_esit, tmp;
 	int base;
 	int i, j;
-	u8 uframes = DIV_ROUND_UP(sch_ep->maxpkt, FS_PAYLOAD_MAX);
 
 	num_esit = XHCI_MTK_MAX_ESIT / sch_ep->esit;
-
-	if (sch_ep->ep_type == INT_IN_EP || sch_ep->ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP)
-		offset++;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < num_esit; i++) {
 		base = offset + i * sch_ep->esit;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < uframes; j++) {
+		/*
+		 * Compared with hs bus, no matter what ep type,
+		 * the hub will always delay one uframe to send data
+		 */
+		for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->cs_count; j++) {
 			tmp = tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] + sch_ep->bw_cost_per_microframe;
 			if (tmp > FS_PAYLOAD_MAX)
 				return -ESCH_BW_OVERFLOW;
@@ -547,8 +546,6 @@ static void update_sch_tt(struct mu3h_sch_ep_info *sch_ep, bool used)
 	u32 base, num_esit;
 	int bw_updated;
 	int i, j;
-	int offset = sch_ep->offset;
-	u8 uframes = DIV_ROUND_UP(sch_ep->maxpkt, FS_PAYLOAD_MAX);
 
 	num_esit = XHCI_MTK_MAX_ESIT / sch_ep->esit;
 
@@ -557,13 +554,10 @@ static void update_sch_tt(struct mu3h_sch_ep_info *sch_ep, bool used)
 	else
 		bw_updated = -sch_ep->bw_cost_per_microframe;
 
-	if (sch_ep->ep_type == INT_IN_EP || sch_ep->ep_type == ISOC_IN_EP)
-		offset++;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < num_esit; i++) {
-		base = offset + i * sch_ep->esit;
+		base = sch_ep->offset + i * sch_ep->esit;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < uframes; j++)
+		for (j = 0; j < sch_ep->cs_count; j++)
 			tt->fs_bus_bw[base + j] += bw_updated;
 	}
 
-- 
2.18.0