[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210826025550.sshd7xl3gsuendoi@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:25:50 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/34] opp: Add dev_pm_opp_sync() helper
On 26-08-21, 08:24, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-08-21, 18:41, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Thinking a bit more about this, I got a nicer variant which actually works in all cases for Tegra.
> >
> > Viresh / Ulf, what do you think about this:
>
> This is what I have been suggesting from day 1 :)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20210818055849.ybfajzu75ecpdrbn@vireshk-i7/
>
> "
> And if it is all about just syncing the genpd core, then can the
> genpd core do something like what clk framework does? i.e. allow a
> new optional genpd callback, get_performance_state() (just like
> set_performance_state()), which can be called initially by the core
> to get the performance to something other than zero.
> "
>
> Looks good to me :)
When you refresh this stuff, please send only 3-4 patches to update
the core stuff and show an example. Once we finalize with the
interface, you can update all the users. Else this is just noise for
everyone else.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists