[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a870141-089d-5e2b-48a7-448695e26238@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:28:29 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, rocco.yue@...il.com,
chao.song@...iatek.com, zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] ipv6: add IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU to expose mtu
value
On 8/25/21 11:46 PM, Rocco Yue wrote:
> @@ -5651,6 +5654,9 @@ static int inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_dev *idev,
> if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_INET6_ADDR_GEN_MODE, idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode))
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU, idev->ra_mtu))
I should have seen this earlier. The intent here is to only notify
userspace if the RA contains an MTU in which case this should be
if (idev->ra_mtu &&
nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU, idev->ra_mtu))
and in which case idev->ra_mtu should be initialized to 0 explicitly,
not U32_MIN.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists