[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSjCvbWE6sZ29dPr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:47:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Artem Kashkanov <artem.kashkanov@...el.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] perf: KVM: Fix, optimize, and clean up callbacks
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 04:01:45PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> On 27/8/2021 3:44 pm, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > You just have to make sure all static_call() invocations that started
> > before unreg are finished before continuing with the unload.
> > synchronize_rcu() can help with that.
>
> Do you mean something like that:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 64e310ff4f3a..e7d310af7509 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8465,6 +8465,7 @@ void kvm_arch_exit(void)
> #endif
> kvm_lapic_exit();
> perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> + synchronize_rcu();
>
> if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
> cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index e466fc8176e1..63ae56c5d133 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -6508,6 +6508,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_register_guest_info_callbacks);
> int perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
> {
> perf_guest_cbs = NULL;
> + arch_perf_update_guest_cbs();
I'm thinking the synchronize_rcu() should go here, and access to
perf_guest_cbs should be wrapped to yell when called with preemption
enabled.
But yes..
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks);
>
> >
> > This is module unload 101. Nothing specific to static_call().
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists