[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSjkosA6yMrMmaNk@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:12:02 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with Linus' tree
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 04:49:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> net/qrtr/mhi.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 9ebc2758d0bb ("Revert "net: really fix the build..."")
>
> from the origin tree and commit:
>
> 0092a1e3f763 ("bus: mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag")
>
> from the char-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the commit in Linus' tree is basically a revert of the
> char-misc tree, so I effectively reverted the latter) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Hm, what should I do in my tree here?
Kalle, what commit should I make in the char-misc tree now to handle
this issue, and make the merge with Linus's tree "simple"? Or any other
ideas?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists