[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0fcbb1e-bf15-5ad2-6ff5-55b7c2acb29c@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:39:32 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 27 (sound/soc/mediatek: Kconfig)
On 8/27/21 4:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210826:
>
> The kbuild tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> The uml tree gained a conflict against the asm-generic tree.
>
> The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
> patch and it also gained a semantic conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The bpf-next tree lost its build failure.
>
> The tip tree gained conflicts against the arm64 tree.
>
> The ftrace tree gained a conflict against the uml tree.
>
> The vfio tree gained conflicts against the drm tree.
>
> The kspp tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> next-20210825.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9867
> 9528 files changed, 552507 insertions(+), 227054 deletions(-)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ). If you
> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
> old one. You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
> master.
>
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
> files in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built
> with a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a
> multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf. After
> the final fixups (if any), I do an x86_64 modules_install followed by
> builds for x86_64 allnoconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
> ppc44x_defconfig, allyesconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, sparc
> and sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs. And finally, a simple boot test
> of the powerpc pseries_le_defconfig kernel in qemu (with and without
> kvm enabled).
>
> Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
>
> I am currently merging 334 trees (counting Linus' and 90 trees of bug
> fix patches pending for the current merge release).
>
> Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
> http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .
>
> Status of my local build tests will be at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give
> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> more builds.
>
> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds. And to Paul
> Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.
>
on i386:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_MT6359
Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && MTK_PMIC_WRAP [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- SND_SOC_MT8195_MT6359_RT1019_RT5682 [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && I2C [=y] && SND_SOC_MT8195 [=y]
caused by 40d605df0a7b: ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add machine driver with mt6359, rt1019 and rt5682
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Download attachment "config-r1771.gz" of type "application/gzip" (33706 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists