[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <973eaa59-771c-1908-5f85-94cfb56870a2@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:31:54 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest
request NAEs
On 8/27/21 3:17 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:57:11PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> The main thing about this is that it is an error code from the HV on
>> extended guest requests. The HV error code sits in the high-order 32-bits of
>> the SW_EXIT_INFO_2 field. So defining it either way seems a bit confusing.
>> To me, the value should just be 1ULL and then it should be shifted when
>> assigning it to the SW_EXIT_INFO_2.
>
> Err, that's from the GHCB spec:
>
> "The hypervisor must validate that the guest has supplied enough pages
>
> ...
>
> certificate data in the RBX register and set the SW_EXITINFO2 field to
> 0x0000000100000000."
>
> So if you wanna do the above, you need to fix the spec first. I'd say.
>
> :-)
See the NAE Event table that documents "State from Hypervisor" where it
says the upper 32-bits (63:32) will contain the return code from the
hypervisor.
In the case you quoted, that specific situation is documented to return a
hypervisor return code of 1 (since the hypervisor return code occupies
bits 63:32). The hypervisor is free to return other values, that need not
be documented in spec, if it encounters other types of unforeseeable errors.
Thanks,
Tom
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists