lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210828102302.d7nhe2bkw6h5quqa@kari-VirtualBox>
Date:   Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:23:02 +0300
From:   Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To:     Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hello@...anbrattlof.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: fix docs typos and references to
 previous struct names


Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: fix ...

This is version 2. Subject needs to be [PATCH v2]. If you generate using
git format-patch add "-v 2" in there.

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:12:42PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
> struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not updated
> in the comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
> ---

You should have log here what did you change from previous version as
this is v2. You can also add who ask this change That should be like
this:

---
Put your version log here.
---

>  drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 23 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> index d5c1521192c1..855f0bebdc1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> @@ -5,14 +5,13 @@
>   * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
>   *
>   * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
> - * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
> - * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
> + * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
> + * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
>   *
> - * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
> - * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
> + * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
> + * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
> + * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
>   *
> - * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
> - * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
>   * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
>   *	Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-entwicklungen.de>
>   */
> @@ -33,8 +32,8 @@ enum option_on_off {
>  /* IOCTL structs and commands */
>  
>  /**
> - * struct pi433_tx_config
> - * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending
> + * struct pi433_tx_cfg
> + * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending data
>   * @frequency:
>   * @bit_rate:
>   * @modulation:
> @@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ enum option_on_off {
>   * @repetitions:
>   *
>   * ATTENTION:
> - * If the contents of 'pi433_tx_config' ever change
> + * If the contents of 'pi433_tx_cfg' ever change
>   * incompatibly, then the ioctl number (see define below) must change.
>   *
>   * NOTE: struct layout is the same in 64bit and 32bit userspace.
> @@ -81,8 +80,8 @@ struct pi433_tx_cfg {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> - * struct pi433_rx_config
> - * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending
> + * struct pi433_rx_cfg
> + * describes the configuration of the radio module for receiving data
>   * @frequency:
>   * @bit_rate:
>   * @modulation:
> @@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ struct pi433_tx_cfg {
>   * @repetitions:
>   *
>   * ATTENTION:
> - * If the contents of 'pi433_rx_config' ever change
> + * If the contents of 'pi433_rx_cfg' ever change
>   * incompatibly, then the ioctl number (see define below) must change
>   *
>   * NOTE: struct layout is the same in 64bit and 32bit userspace.
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ