[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSnT5rXxQNE2sPvw@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 08:12:54 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
Cc: hello@...anbrattlof.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: fix docs typos and references to
previous struct names
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
> struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
> in the comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> @@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
> * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
> *
> * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
> - * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
> - * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
> + * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
> + * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
> *
> - * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
> - * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
> + * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
> + * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
> + * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
> *
> - * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
> - * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
> * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
> - * Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-entwicklungen.de>
> + * Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-entwicklungen.de>
Indentation of the name should remain here, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists