[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210829142802.GA186881@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 22:28:02 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: cti: Correct the parameter for pm_runtime_put
Hi Tao,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:29:37PM +0800, Tao Zhang wrote:
> The input parameter of the function pm_runtime_put should be the
> same in the function cti_enable_hw and cti_disable_hw. The correct
> parameter to use here should be dev->parent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c
> index e2a3620..8988b2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int cti_disable_hw(struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
> coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(csdev);
> CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> - pm_runtime_put(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
coresight_register() allocates data structure 'coresight_device' and
assigns probed device to the field 'coresight_device::dev::parent';
thus afterwards we need to pass 'coresight_device::dev::parent' for
pm_runtime_xxx() functions. It's not directive for understanding, so
log the info at here.
For the patch:
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
We could wait for Mike to review as well.
Thanks,
Leo
> return 0;
>
> /* not disabled this call */
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists