[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210829181431.67a52d36@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 18:14:31 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
angelo.compagnucci@...il.com,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc128s052: Fix the error handling path of
'adc128_probe()'
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:45:38 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 23/08/2021 à 08:42, Alexandru Ardelean a écrit :
> > On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 1:43 PM Christophe JAILLET
> > <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> A successful 'regulator_enable()' call should be balanced by a
> >> corresponding 'regulator_disable()' call in the error handling path of the
> >> probe, as already done in the remove function.
> >>
> >> Update the error handling path accordingly.
> >
> > Good catch.
> > For the fix:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Applied and marked for stable.
Thanks,
> >
> > If you want, you can also send a conversion to
> > devm_iio_device_register() for this driver.
> > And also move the regulator_disable() on a devm_add_action_or_reset() callback.
> > Maybe, that's already part of your plan. If so, apologies for the noise :)
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I hadn't planned another step but I can send a follow-up patch for that.
>
> CJ
Note I'll have to sit on that one until this patch is upstream which will be a few weeks
(perhaps a month) given timing.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists