linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/9] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8994: Modernize the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:55:00 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/9] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8994: Modernize the
 driver


On 29.08.2021 21:52, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2021-08-29 12:36:09)
>> Switch to the newer-style parent_data and remove the hardcoded
>> xo clock.
> This is OK because nothing else is using the hardcoded name of "xo",
> like another clk driver on this SoC?

8994 only has RPMCC and MMCC* apart from GCC and both are prepared for this.



*not counting DEBUGCC and CPUCC for obvious reasons (they are missing upstream)


Konrad