[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <964ef8cae3e1eb276da4d891a6daac6ed05bb734.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:08:27 +0800
From: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/3] cpufreq: Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 10:34 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-08-21, 23:01, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu
> > to specific performance domain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 39
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index 9fd7194..4916d70 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > #include <linux/kobject.h>
> > #include <linux/notifier.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > @@ -1036,6 +1038,43 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(const struct
> > cpumask *cpus,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> > +static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int index,
> > const char *list_name,
> > + const char
> > *cell_name,
> > + struct cpumask
> > *cpumask)
>
> What happened with the discussion we had about returning index and
> passing CPU
> there ?
>
Hi, Viresh, sorry for this, I didn't upload the correct version of
cpufreq.h. Should I just go v15 or you want to do some review for other
part of my patches? Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists