linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: protect BE dailink state changes in trigger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YSy91xTP/5oSedrZ@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:15:35 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Mark@...ena.org.uk,
        Brown@...ena.org.uk, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        vkoul@...nel.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: protect BE dailink state changes
 in trigger

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

> Ah sorry, there were still some issues in this RFC, we did more testing
> and came up with a lot of improvements. The intent of the RFC status was
> also to make sure it wasn't applied before the merge window.

> Can this be reverted in your branch Mark?

Ugh, right.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)