[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSzMB80NOkNvdjy1@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:16:07 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 01:52:48PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Whether the API is better is debatable. As I said, almost no drivers use
> the new XArray interface, and perhaps partly because the new interface
> isn't as intuitive as has been claimed (e.g. xa_load() instead of
> ida_find()). And IDR/IDA isn't marked/documented as deprecated as far as
> I know.
I can't just slap a 'deprecated' attribute on it. That'll cause a
storm of warnings. What would you suggest I do to warn people that
this interface is deprecated and I would like to remove it?
Why do you think that idr_find() is more intuitive than xa_load()?
The 'find' verb means that you search for something. But it doesn't
search for anything; it just returns the pointer at that index.
'find' should return the next non-NULL pointer at-or-above a given
index.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists