[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5124460b547a5f77a19e292bfb785aabde764189.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:45:24 +0200
From: nsaenzju@...hat.com
To: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Serge Schneider <serge@...pberrypi.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, fedora-rpi@...glegroups.com,
Mwesigwa Guma <mguma@...hat.com>,
Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] sensehat: Add device tree overlay (do not
merge)
Hi Charles,
On Fri, 2021-08-20 at 14:08 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> This patch is an RFC. The overlay included here is suitable for the
> Sense HAT but we are not sure where overlays like this should go, or if we
> should even include it, because the Raspberry Pi kernel tree already
> includes that device tree blob that this was based on and most
> distributions for the Raspberry Pi include those blobs.
>
> The overlay is just in the root of the source tree since we did not know
> where to put it so this patch should not be merged in this state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mwesigwa Guma <mguma@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
> ---
Once we get this merged, and since upstream doesn't yet mantain overlays, I
suggest you merge this overlay in the downstream rpi kernel repo, who actively
maintain them. AFAIK a number of distros use that repo as the base for their
devicetrees.
That said, I think providing a devicetree binding for this driver is a must for
it to be merged (in yaml form).
Regards,
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists