[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210830155945.yuirq5tsy2migovk@pali>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:59:45 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation
and remove ack function
On Monday 30 August 2021 11:22:37 Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> INTX mask and unmask fields in PCL_RCV_INTX register should only be
> set/reset for each bit. Clearing by PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK should be
> removed.
>
> INTX status fields in PCL_RCV_INTX register only indicates each INTX
> interrupt status, so the handler can't clear by writing 1 to the field.
> The status is expected to be cleared by the interrupt origin.
> The ack function has no meaning, so should remove it.
>
> Fixes: 7e6d5cd88a6f ("PCI: uniphier: Add UniPhier PCIe host controller support")
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 16 ----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> index ebe43e9..26f630c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> @@ -181,19 +181,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv)
> writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
>
> -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> - struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> - u32 val;
> -
> - val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_STATUS;
> - val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_STATUS_SHIFT);
> - writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> -}
> -
> static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> @@ -202,7 +189,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> u32 val;
>
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
> @@ -215,14 +201,12 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> u32 val;
>
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val &= ~BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip uniphier_pcie_irq_chip = {
> .name = "PCI",
> - .irq_ack = uniphier_pcie_irq_ack,
> .irq_mask = uniphier_pcie_irq_mask,
> .irq_unmask = uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask,
> };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists