[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742108c3-7c76-0bc3-fc13-06acf975c25c@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:14:02 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] nvme: avoid race in shutdown namespace removal
On 8/30/21 12:04 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:36:18AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Though one thing I am not really sure how it interacts with
>> nvme_init_ns_head() as we could be in running nvme_init_ns_head()
>> after we have set last_path = true. I haven't really figured
>> out yet what this would mean. Is this a real problem?
>
> I suspect it will regress the very thing 5396fdac56d8 ("nvme: fix
> refcounting imbalance when all paths are down") tried to fix.
>
Most likely. Do drop me a mail on how to create a reproducer for that;
it's not exactly trivial as you need to patch qemu for that
(and, of course, those patches will not go upstream as they again hit a
section which the maintainer deemed to be reworked any time now. So of
course he can't possibly apply them.)
(I seem to have a particular spell of bad luck, seeing that it's the
_third_ time this happened to me :-( )
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists