[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb07e806-71bf-6bac-ac3c-1d99136d6f8e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:26:43 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: qiang.zhang@...driver.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace/osnoise: fix missed cpus_read_unlock()
Hi Qiang,
On 8/29/21 7:52 AM, qiang.zhang@...driver.com wrote:
> From: "Qiang.zhang" <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
set the Subject to:
trace/osnoise: Fix missed cpus_read_unlock() in start_per_cpu_kthreads()
>
> When start_kthread() return error, the cpus_read_unlock() need
> to be called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang.zhang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
Add:
Fixes: c8895e271f79 ("trace/osnoise: Support hotplug operations")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.14+
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> index 65b08b8e5bf8..45d22d6f3acb 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> @@ -1568,6 +1568,7 @@ static int start_per_cpu_kthreads(struct trace_array *tr)
> retval = start_kthread(cpu);
> if (retval) {
> stop_per_cpu_kthreads();
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> return retval;
> }
> }
Why not initialize retval = 0, and then remove the "return retval" from this if,
returning rteval at the end of the function?
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists