[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS0eXMd5Y5yV/m1m@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:07:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: "open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)"
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"kjain@...ux.ibm.com" <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/3] perf: enable branch record for software
events
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 05:41:46PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(perf_snapshot_branch_stack,
> int (*)(struct perf_branch_snapshot *));
> Something like
>
> typedef int (perf_snapshot_branch_stack_t)(struct perf_branch_snapshot *);
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(perf_snapshot_branch_stack, perf_snapshot_branch_stack_t);
>
> seems to work fine.
Oh urg, indeed. It wants a function type, not a function pointer type.
I've been bitten by that before. Go with the typedef, that's the sanest.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists