[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS6WxHtJtNDaBxqz@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:53:24 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Clément Bœsch <u@....me>,
Willy Liu <willy.liu@...ltek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sun50i: h5: NanoPI Neo 2: phy-mode
rgmii-id
> True, but then again, DT is a bit special, since it's not used only by Linux.
> It's shared at least with BSDs and U-Boot, which most likely have independent
> driver implementation. That's why it's good to have DT fixes referencing DT
> related commits. As you said, DT described HW wrong.
>
> Looking at past Allwinner related DT commits regarding this issue, we were not
> totally consistent. Most of them reference commit where emac node was
> introduced in DT. But I also found a couple of commits which indeed have fixes
> tag for bbc4d71d6354.
All true, and it is not a big deal if it does go back further. I don't
care, we can let the Allwinner Maintainer decide. Ah, that is you :-)
I just want to try to keep it simple for somebody who is contributing
their first Linux kernel patch. If it is good enough, i say accept it,
and we can do a bit more education on the second contribution.
Andre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists