[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAEAJfB6FBbeEPuzirP2nuU_J9nLFSrczgXYVfNQUZbEJrbc7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 21:41:36 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] phy: phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0: refactor for tx1rx1 addition
Hi Heiko,
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 17:46, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Am Montag, 30. August 2021, 20:07:50 CEST schrieb Mikhail Rudenko:
> > In order to accommodate for rk3399 tx1rx1 addition, make
> > enable/disable function calls indirect via function pointers in
> > rk_dphy_drv_data. Also rename rk_dphy_write and rk_dphy_enable to
> > avoid naming clashes.
>
> You're a bit too late to the party :-( .
>
> The tx1rx1 dphy is living _inside_ the 2nd DSI controller and is
> configured through it.
>
Would you be so kind to push a patch adding some comments to
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dphy-rx0.c with this information?
Thanks,
Ezequiel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists