[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51A4788D-DDFD-4700-9D50-84F37ADD4883@holtmann.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:31:05 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: "Mark-YW Chen (陳揚文)"
<Mark-YW.Chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"michaelfsun@...gle.com" <michaelfsun@...gle.com>,
"mcchou@...omium.org" <mcchou@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Support public address
configuration for MediaTek Chip.
Hi Mark,
>>> The MediaTek chip support vendor specific HCI command(0xfc1a) to
>>> change the public address. Add hdev->set_bdaddr handler for MediaTek
>>> Chip.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: mark-yw.chen <mark-yw.chen@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> index 60d2fce59a71..41e7c9f28d82 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> @@ -2200,6 +2200,23 @@ struct btmtk_section_map {
>>> };
>>> } __packed;
>>>
>>> +static int btusb_set_bdaddr_mtk(struct hci_dev *hdev, const bdaddr_t
>>> +*bdaddr) {
>>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> + long ret;
>>> +
>>> + skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hdev, 0xfc1a, sizeof(bdaddr), bdaddr,
>> HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(skb);
>>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "changing Mediatek device address failed
>> (%ld)",
>>> + ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> this is not a permanent change, correct? Meaning a power cycle will bring back
>> the original BD_ADDR?
>>
>
> Yes, it's not a permanent change.
> After doing a power cycle or Mediatek specific Bluetooth reset, Mediatek Chips will bring back the original BD_ADDRESS.
ok, good. Then please re-submit against latest bluetooth-next tree. Unfortunately current patch doesn’t apply anymore.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists