[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpEnZo8nji3R=6ek=2T2TSG=Ke22PJzV_WkYFeSV4R9beg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:21:38 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
vincenzo.frascino@....com,
Chinwen Chang (張錦文)
<chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, apopple@...dia.com,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, feng.tang@...el.com,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, krisman@...labora.com,
chris.hyser@...cle.com, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, legion@...nel.org,
Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Thomas Cedeno <thomascedeno@...gle.com>, sashal@...nel.org,
cxfcosmos@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm: add a field to store names for private
anonymous memory
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 9:59 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:16:14AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 1:12 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> > <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28/08/2021 23.47, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:52 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>> + case PR_SET_VMA_ANON_NAME:
> > > >>>> + name = strndup_user((const char __user *)arg,
> > > >>>> + ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN);
> > > >>>> +
> > > >>>> + if (IS_ERR(name))
> > > >>>> + return PTR_ERR(name);
> > > >>>> +
> > > >>>> + for (pch = name; *pch != '\0'; pch++) {
> > > >>>> + if (!isprint(*pch)) {
> > > >>>> + kfree(name);
> > > >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think isprint() is too weak a check. For example, I would suggest
> > > >>> forbidding the following characters: ':', ']', '[', ' '. Perhaps
> > >
> > > Indeed. There's also the issue that the kernel's ctype actually
> > > implements some almost-but-not-quite latin1, so (some) chars above 0x7f
> > > would also pass isprint() - while everybody today expects utf-8, so the
> > > ability to put almost arbitrary sequences of chars with the high bit set
> > > could certainly confuse some parsers. IOW, don't use isprint() at all,
> > > just explicitly check for the byte values that we and up agreeing to
> > > allow/forbid.
> > >
> > > >>> isalnum() would be better? (permit a-zA-Z0-9) I wouldn't necessarily
> > > >>> be opposed to some punctuation characters, but let's avoid creating
> > > >>> confusion. Do you happen to know which characters are actually in use
> > > >>> today?
> > > >>
> > > >> There's some sense in refusing [, ], and :, but removing " " seems
> > > >> unhelpful for reasonable descriptors. As long as weird stuff is escaped,
> > > >> I think it's fine. Any parser can just extract with m|\[anon:(.*)\]$|
> > > >
> > > > I see no issue in forbidding '[' and ']' but whitespace and ':' are
> > > > currently used by Android. Would forbidding or escaping '[' and ']' be
> > > > enough?
> > >
> > > how about allowing [0x20, 0x7e] except [0x5b, 0x5d], i.e. all printable
> > > (including space) ascii characters, except [ \ ] - the brackets as
> > > already discussed, and backslash because then there's nobody who can get
> > > confused about whether there's some (and then which?) escaping mechanism
> > > in play - "\n" is simply never going to appear. Simple rules, easy to
> > > implement, easy to explain in a man page.
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion, Rasmus. I'm all for keeping it simple.
> > Kees, Matthew, would that be acceptable?
>
> Yes, I think so. It permits all kinds of characters that might
> be confusing if passed on to something else, but we can't prohibit
> everything, and forbidding just these three should remove any confusion
> for any parser of /proc. Little Bobby Tables thanks you.
Thanks for all the feedback! I think I have enough change suggestions
to resping the next revision. Will send an update later today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists