[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS6NSLhZKx0mlcYC@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:12:56 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Tawah Peggy <tawahpeggy98@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] [Outreachy Kernel] Staging: wlan-ng:
cfg80211: Fix Lines should not end with a '('
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Tawah Peggy wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback Mattew,
> please what approach do you suggest I use?
[please don't remove mailing lists; other people may benefit from the
answers to your questions]
There are a number of different approaches you can take to fixing this
kind of warning.
1. Reduce indentation. This call seems to be indented 3-4 levels,
so maybe it would be good to pull part of this function out into
a helper function.
2. Use a local variable.
type center_freq = request->channels[i]->center_freq;
ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(center_freq);
3. Reduce the length of the function name. ieee80211_frequency_to_channel
is quite a long identifier. Maybe it would be worth renaming.
4. Introduce a helper function, eg
static inline foo something_to_channel(struct bar *channel)
{
return ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(channel->center_freq);
}
...
something_to_channel(request->channels[i]);
There's a judgement call to be made, and without looking at the function
in detail, I don't know which of these methods might be best.
> tawah peggy
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:50 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:15:51AM +0100, Tawah Peggy wrote:
> > > - ieee80211_frequency_to_channel(
> > > - request->channels[i]->center_freq);
> > > + ieee80211_frequency_to_channel
> > > + (request->channels[i]->center_freq);
> >
> > This is the wrong way to fix this warning. Function names should not be
> > divorced from their arguments.
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists