[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOKbgA44BW824W_OqL8LO1FcaWdomrsYsr-kMHSj3cV1daJ4fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:47:12 +0700
From: Dmitry Kadashev <dkadashev@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] namei: Fix use after free in kern_path_locked
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:13 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 02:35:08PM +0700, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> > Ouch. Thanks for taking care of this, Stephen. I guess
> > filename_parentat() should be killed, since kern_path_locked() was the
> > only place it's used in and it always results in danging "last",
> > provoking bugs just like this one. I can send a patch on top of this if
> > you prefer.
>
> Yes. And then rename __filename_parentat to filename_parentat, please.
I see why you want it to be renamed - and I'll send the patch. The only
problem I have with the rename is with __filename_parentat() there is a
nice uniformity: filename_* functions consume the passed name, and
__filename_* do not. So maybe it's something nice to have. Maybe not.
Anyway, as I've mentioned, I'll send the patch and it can be either
picked up or ignored.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists