[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpQqKx2UDo4kc3eAxPfp47gOGbjtnm0fg1q+bshpb-vew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:44:51 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: fw_devlink: Don't create device links for
devices not on a bus
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 00:45, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Devices that are not on a bus will never have a driver bound to it. So,
> fw_devlink should not create device links for it as it can cause probe
> issues[1] or sync_state() call back issues[2].
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGETcx_xJCqOWtwZ9Ee2+0sPGNLM5=F=djtbdYENkAYZa0ynqQ@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPDyKFo9Bxremkb1dDrr4OcXSpE0keVze94Cm=zrkOVxHHxBmQ@mail.gmail.com/
Unfortunately, this doesn't fix my problem in [2].
When the "soctest" device is initialized, via of_platform_populate(),
it will be attached to the platform bus, hence the check for the bus
pointer that you suggest to add below, doesn't have an impact on my
use case. I still get the below in the log:
"platform soctest: Linked as a sync state only consumer to pm_domain_test"
Kind regards
Uffe
> Fixes: f9aa460672c9 ("driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature")
> Reported-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index f6360490a4a3..304a06314656 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -1719,8 +1719,24 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
> struct device *sup_dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * If a consumer device is not on a bus (i.e. a driver will never bind
> + * to it), it doesn't make sense for fw_devlink to create device links
> + * for it.
> + */
> + if (con->bus == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(sup_handle);
> if (sup_dev) {
> + /*
> + * If a supplier device is not on a bus (i.e. a driver will
> + * never bind to it), it doesn't make sense for fw_devlink to
> + * create device links for it.
> + */
> + if (sup_dev->bus == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * If it's one of those drivers that don't actually bind to
> * their device using driver core, then don't wait on this
> --
> 2.33.0.259.gc128427fd7-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists