[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a259e10d-39c9-c4a5-0ab4-f42a1b9bfaee@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:22:06 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@...e.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private
memory
On 01.09.21 18:18, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 08:54 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> [...]
>> If you want to swap a page on TDX, you can't. Sorry, go directly to
>> jail, do not collect $200.
>
> Actually, even on SEV-ES you can't either. You can read the encrypted
> page and write it out if you want, but unless you swap it back to the
> exact same physical memory location, the encryption key won't work.
> Since we don't guarantee this for swap, I think swap won't actually
> work for any confidential computing environment.
>
>> So I think there are literally zero code paths that currently call
>> try_to_unmap() that will actually work like that on TDX. If we run
>> out of memory on a TDX host, we can kill the guest completely and
>> reclaim all of its memory (which probably also involves killing QEMU
>> or whatever other user program is in charge), but that's really our
>> only option.
>
> I think our only option for swap is guest co-operation. We're going to
> have to inflate a balloon or something in the guest and have the guest
> driver do some type of bounce of the page, where it becomes an
> unencrypted page in the guest (so the host can read it without the
> physical address keying of the encryption getting in the way) but
> actually encrypted with a swap transfer key known only to the guest. I
> assume we can use the page acceptance infrastructure currently being
> discussed elsewhere to do swap back in as well ... the host provides
> the guest with the encrypted swap page and the guest has to decrypt it
> and place it in encrypted guest memory.
Ballooning is indeed *the* mechanism to avoid swapping in the hypervisor
and much rather let the guest swap. Shame it requires trusting a guest,
which we, in general, can't. Not to mention other issues we already do
have with ballooning (latency, broken auto-ballooning, over-inflating, ...).
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists