linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:35:18 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification support

On 9/1/21 5:37 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.high_temp_notif;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_low_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.low_temp_notif;
> +}

Please do not introduce single line inline functions.

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba) ||
> +	       ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba);
> +}

Since this function is not in any hot path (command processing), 
shouldn't it be moved into ufshcd.c?

Thanks,

Bart.