[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97164928-e2d7-fd3f-e063-9174b028ed65@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:04:20 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: "tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'soc@...nel.org'" <soc@...nel.org>,
"'tony.luck@...el.com'" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"'arnd@...db.de'" <arnd@...db.de>,
"'will@...nel.org'" <will@...nel.org>,
"'catalin.marinas@....com'" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"'olof@...om.net'" <olof@...om.net>,
"misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: About resctrl code rebase
Hi Tan Shaopeng,
On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
>> control function into resctrl.
>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/
and there are a couple more after that.
>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
>> And where is the rebase code?
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)
I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.
> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists