[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg4QPSb-4c1gpSUhgMfffKLKvvaAy6uiKM4RwxWyEYV2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:12:58 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/setup: Explicitly include acpi.h
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:09 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> After commit 342f43af70db ("iscsi_ibft: fix crash due to KASLR physical
> memory remapping") x86_64_defconfig shows the following errors:
Strange. I wonder why I didn't see that - not even in my smaller config builds.
> acpi.h was being implicitly included from iscsi_ibft.h in this
> configuration so the removal of that header means these functions have
> no definition or declaration. Add acpi.h explicitly so there is no more
> error.
The patch is clearly ok, I wonder what way _my_ config included acpi.h
ended up coming in..
[ Goes off and looks. Oh, because I got it from <linux/tboot.h> and
had CONFIG_INTEL_TXT enabled. ]
> Linus, would you mind taking this directly?
Will do.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists