lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFki+L=wYqKZon8TRdMhOHfS3goh7yHXQFDb7RXM=iOJeZJBPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:49:53 -0400
From:   Nitesh Lal <nilal@...hat.com>
To:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Alex Belits <abelits@...its.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 2/8] add prctl task isolation prctl docs and samples

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:38 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:11:56AM -0400, Nitesh Lal wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:42 AM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add documentation and userspace sample code for prctl
> > > task isolation interface.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/userspace-api/task_isolation.rst |  211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  samples/Kconfig                                |    7
> > >  samples/Makefile                               |    1
> > >  samples/task_isolation/Makefile                |    9 +
> > >  samples/task_isolation/task_isol.c             |   83 +++++++++
> > >  samples/task_isolation/task_isol.h             |    9 +
> > >  samples/task_isolation/task_isol_userloop.c    |   56 ++++++
> > >  7 files changed, 376 insertions(+)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +       if (ret) {
> > > +               perror("mlock");
> > > +               return EXIT_FAILURE;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       ret = task_isol_setup();
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return EXIT_FAILURE;
> >
> > The above check condition should be 'ret == -1', isn't it?
>
> task_isol_setup returns 0 on success, so fail to see the point
> of testing for ret == -1 rather than ret != 0 ?
>

Hmm, could be something that I misinterpreted.
I will double-check.

-- 
Thanks
Nitesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ