linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: SND_SOC_MT8195 should depend on ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163051912509.21630.17446670283577790838.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  1 Sep 2021 19:14:43 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: SND_SOC_MT8195 should depend on ARCH_MEDIATEK

On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:18:54 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The Mediatek MT8195 sound hardware is only present on Mediatek MT8195
> SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MEDIATEK, to prevent asking the
> user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Mediatek SoC
> support.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: SND_SOC_MT8195 should depend on ARCH_MEDIATEK
      commit: 940ffa19454704ca2ecd23b0d8dd604c93421bfa

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark