[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8ef35f7-efa1-0e2f-e1ab-7b0df4a5ae2d@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:27:26 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
"D Scott Phillips OS" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/20] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use
supports_mba_mbps()
Hi James,
On 7/29/2021 3:35 PM, James Morse wrote:
> To determine whether the mba_mbps option to resctrl should be supported,
mba_mbps -> mba_MBps
> resctrl tests the boot cpus' x86_vendor.
CPU
>
> This isn't portable, and needs abstracting behind a helper so this check
> can be part of the filesystem code that moves to /fs/.
>
> Re-use the tests set_mba_sc() does to determine if the mba_sc is supported
> on this system. An 'alloc_capable' test is added so that this property
> isn't implied by 'linear'.
Why can linear not imply alloc_capable? It is a property of a MBA
resource so if it is set then it has to be a MBA resource.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index e321ea5de562..4388685548a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1888,17 +1888,26 @@ void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Enable or disable the MBA software controller
> - * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps.
> * MBA software controller is supported only if
> * MBM is supported and MBA is in linear scale.
> */
> +static bool supports_mba_mbps(void)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
> +
> + return (is_mbm_enabled() &&
> + r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear());
As mentioned above I do not see need for the alloc_capable check since
this is hardcoded to be a MBA resource for which delay_linear can only
be set if alloc_capable is set.
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable or disable the MBA software controller
> + * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps.
> + */
> static int set_mba_sc(bool mba_sc)
> {
> struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
>
> - if (!is_mbm_enabled() || !is_mba_linear() ||
> - mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r))
> + if (!supports_mba_mbps() || mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> r->membw.mba_sc = mba_sc;
> @@ -2317,7 +2326,7 @@ static int rdt_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
> ctx->enable_cdpl2 = true;
> return 0;
> case Opt_mba_mbps:
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
I am not familiar with the history but it looks like AMD does not
support linear (based on __rdt_get_mem_config_amd()) which may be the
reason for this test and thus moving it to a feature check is ok.
> + if (supports_mba_mbps())
> return -EINVAL;
> ctx->enable_mba_mbps = true;
> return 0;
>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists