[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YS9Aa0tADAf5KMSl@Marijn-Arch-PC.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:57:15 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Pavel Dubrova <pashadubrova@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Remove transient global
"xo" clock
On 2021-08-31 22:35:56, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Marijn Suijten (2021-08-30 11:24:45)
> > The DSI PHY/PLL was relying on a global "xo" clock to be found, but the
> > real clock is named "xo_board" in the DT. The standard nowadays is to
> > never use global clock names anymore but require the firmware (DT) to
> > provide every clock binding explicitly with .fw_name. The DSI PLLs have
> > since been converted to this mechanism (specifically 14nm for SDM660)
> > and this transient clock can now be removed.
> >
> > This issue was originally discovered in:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/386db1a6-a1cd-3c7d-a88e-dc83f8a1be96@somainline.org/
> > and prevented the removal of "xo" at that time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> > ---
>
> Presumably this wants to go with the first one.
What are you referring to with "the first one"? This patch can only go
in after patch 1/2 of this series, unless you are suggesting to squash
it with Bjorns cleanup and making sure that lands after the fix in the
DSI?
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists