linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] UCSI race condition resulting in wrong port state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:26:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ian Turner <vectro@...tro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] UCSI race condition resulting in wrong port state

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 02:09:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > Note, you are responding to an email from a very long time ago...
> 
> Yeah, was sort of purpose :) (to try to retain the original context of
> the question of if the commits should be backported to stable series,
> which back then had no need raised)
> > 
> > > > Due to the lack of response, I guess they don't need to go to any stable
> > > > kernel, so will queue them up for 5.11-rc1.
> > > 
> > > At least one user in Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/992004) would be
> > > happy to have those backported as well to the 5.10.y series (which we
> > > will pick up).
> > > 
> > > So if Benjamin ack's this, this would be great to have in 5.10.y.
> > 
> > What are the git commit ids?  Just ask for them to be applied to stable
> > like normal...
> 
> Right, aplogies. The two commits were
> 47ea2929d58c35598e681212311d35b240c373ce and
> 217504a055325fe76ec1142aa15f14d3db77f94f.
> 
> 47ea2929d58c ("usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Always decode connector change information")
> 217504a05532 ("usb: typec: ucsi: Work around PPM losing change information")
> 
> and in the followup Benjamin Berg mentioned to pick as well
> 
> 8c9b3caab3ac26db1da00b8117901640c55a69dd
> 
> 8c9b3caab3ac ("usb: typec: ucsi: Clear pending after acking connector change"
> 
> a related fix later on.

All now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h