linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 074/103] mtd: spinand: Fix incorrect parameters for on-die ECC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  1 Sep 2021 14:28:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        voice INTER connect GmbH <developer@...ceinterconnect.de>,
        Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 074/103] mtd: spinand: Fix incorrect parameters for on-die ECC


From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>

The new generic NAND ECC framework stores the configuration and
requirements in separate places since commit 93ef92f6f422 ("mtd: nand: Use
the new generic ECC object"). In 5.10.x The SPI NAND layer still uses only
the requirements to track the ECC properties. This mismatch leads to
values of zero being used for ECC strength and step_size in the SPI NAND
layer wherever nanddev_get_ecc_conf() is used and therefore breaks the SPI
NAND on-die ECC support in 5.10.x.

By using nanddev_get_ecc_requirements() instead of nanddev_get_ecc_conf()
for SPI NAND, we make sure that the correct parameters for the detected
chip are used. In later versions (5.11.x) this is fixed anyway with the
implementation of the SPI NAND on-die ECC engine.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.10.x
Reported-by: voice INTER connect GmbH <developer@...ceinterconnect.de>
Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c     |    6 +++---
 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/macronix.c |    6 +++---
 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c  |    6 +++---
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int spinand_check_ecc_status(stru
 		 * fixed, so let's return the maximum possible value so that
 		 * wear-leveling layers move the data immediately.
 		 */
-		return nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
+		return nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
 
 	case STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR:
 		return -EBADMSG;
@@ -1090,8 +1090,8 @@ static int spinand_init(struct spinand_d
 	mtd->oobavail = ret;
 
 	/* Propagate ECC information to mtd_info */
-	mtd->ecc_strength = nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
-	mtd->ecc_step_size = nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->step_size;
+	mtd->ecc_strength = nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
+	mtd->ecc_step_size = nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->step_size;
 
 	return 0;
 
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/macronix.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/macronix.c
@@ -84,11 +84,11 @@ static int mx35lf1ge4ab_ecc_get_status(s
 		 * data around if it's not necessary.
 		 */
 		if (mx35lf1ge4ab_get_eccsr(spinand, &eccsr))
-			return nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
+			return nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
 
-		if (WARN_ON(eccsr > nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength ||
+		if (WARN_ON(eccsr > nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength ||
 			    !eccsr))
-			return nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
+			return nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
 
 		return eccsr;
 
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/toshiba.c
@@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ static int tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status
 		 * data around if it's not necessary.
 		 */
 		if (spi_mem_exec_op(spinand->spimem, &op))
-			return nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
+			return nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
 
 		mbf >>= 4;
 
-		if (WARN_ON(mbf > nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength || !mbf))
-			return nanddev_get_ecc_conf(nand)->strength;
+		if (WARN_ON(mbf > nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength || !mbf))
+			return nanddev_get_ecc_requirements(nand)->strength;
 
 		return mbf;