linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: free user PTE page table pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210901135314.GA1859446@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:53:14 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mika.penttila@...tfour.com,
        david@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: free user PTE page table pages

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:18:55AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 2630ed1bb4f4..30757f3b176c 100644
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
>  		return no_page_table(vma, flags);
>  
> +	if (!pte_try_get(mm, pmd))
> +		return no_page_table(vma, flags);
> +
>  	ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);

This is not good on a performance path, the pte_try_get() is
locking/locking the same lock that pte_offset_map_lock() is getting.

This would be much better if the map_lock infra could manage the
refcount itself.

I'm also not really keen on adding ptl level locking to all the
currently no-lock paths. If we are doing that then the no-lock paths
should rely on the ptl for alot more of their operations and avoid the
complicatred no-lock data access we have. eg 'pte_try_get()' should
also copy the pte_t under the lock.

Also, I don't really understand how this scheme works with
get_user_pages_fast.

Currently the zap triggers a TLB invalidation which synchronizes with
GUP fast, however this only makes the ptes non-present. The purpose is
to synchronize with the struct page refcount, not a pte refcount.

With this series the non-present PTEs are freed but how does this
synchronize with gup fast to avoid a use-after-free on the pte struct
page?

I agree with David, this series needs significant splitting to be
readable and a lot more explanation in the commit messages how all the
locking is working. Eg introducing the freeing should be a single
short patch at at end with a full explanation of the locking in all
the major scenarios.

Jason