[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTFX7n9qj2cUh0Ap@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 01:02:06 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: don't bind genphy in
phy_attach_direct if the specific driver defers probe
> > Note that phylink_destroy() is documented as:
> >
> > * Note: the rtnl lock must not be held when calling this function.
> >
...
>
> Any other issues besides needing to take rtnl_mutex top-level when
> calling phylink_destroy?
We should try to keep phylink_create and phylink_destroy symmetrical:
/**
* phylink_create() - create a phylink instance
* @config: a pointer to the target &struct phylink_config
* @fwnode: a pointer to a &struct fwnode_handle describing the network
* interface
* @iface: the desired link mode defined by &typedef phy_interface_t
* @mac_ops: a pointer to a &struct phylink_mac_ops for the MAC.
*
* Create a new phylink instance, and parse the link parameters found in @np.
* This will parse in-band modes, fixed-link or SFP configuration.
*
* Note: the rtnl lock must not be held when calling this function.
Having different locking requirements will catch people out.
Interestingly, there is no ASSERT_NO_RTNL(). Maybe we should add such
a macro.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists